Architectura Fidei Imarch

Personalis Profilium, Subdominis Larva et Postquantalis Subscriptio ut Fundamentum Subiectivitatis Digitalis

In mundo retium socialium homo subiectum esse desiit.
Factus est fluxus contenti qui in tumultu communi evanescit. Postes in cursus nuntiorum submerguntur, auctoritas obscuratur, retransmissiones vim iuridicam non habent, et systema fidei super favores, celeritatem attentionis et algorithmos aedificatur.

Plattaforma imarch.sbs creata est ut alternatio totius huius “inaniae ludus communicationis”.
Non ut alia retis socialis, sed ut architectura institutionalis fidei, ubi:

• omnis actus formam habet,
• omnis subiectum larva habet,
• omnis post subscriptio habet,
• omnis retransmissio actus citationis fit.

Haec non est conatio “Facebook emendare”.
Hic est gradus ad latus: ab oblectatione ad actiones digitales responsabiles.

Cur Mundus Architectura Fidei Egeat

Ambientes digitales moderni tribus problematis fundamentalibus laborant:

Amissio Auctoritatis

Impossibile est probare quis textum primum publicavit.
Facile est delere, copiare, adulterare.

Absentia Verificationis

Favor aut retransmissio nihil confirmat.
Non est actus agnitionis, non documentum, non probatio.

Collapsus Fidei Web2

Plattae centrales algorithmos, data, contextus possident.

Ergo informationem possident.

Utens hic tantum “vector vehiculi publici” est.

Conceptus Imarch: Subiectivitas per Larvam Scaenicam

In Imarch subiectum est larva, habens:

• officium digitale (situm subdominis et electronicam epistulam)
• subscriptionem
• historiam documentorum
• actus verificationis
• famam
• circulum fidei

Larva non est nomen sine facie.
Est forma digitalis, a systemate agnita.

Sicut in institutis classicis:
titulus → responsabilitas → ius publicandi → ius actus subscribendi.

Situs Subdominis Larvae: Locus Originis Originalis

Quaelibet larva suam inscriptionem accipit:

maskname.imarch.sbs

Hic publicantur originalia: articuli, acta, memoranda, declarationes.

Quodlibet originale habet:

• clavem apertam
• subscriptionem postquantalem (CRYSTALS-Dilithium)
• codicem hash verificationis contenti
• nexum ad verificatorem

Quilibet lector verificare potest: a quo subscriptum, quando publicatum, num textus mutatus sit.

👉 Hoc convertit documentum digitale in actum, non in postem.

Profilium Personale: Arx Fidei

Fila informativa utentis in Imarch — non est blog, sed “Arx Fidei”.

Hic:

• retransmissiones → actus citationis apparent
• nexus → circuli fidei videntur
• participatio in systemate figitur
• vestigium famae colligitur

Profilium est interfacies, non subiectum.

Subiectum est larva scaenica verificabilis.

Subscriptio Postquantalis (CRYSTALS-Dilithium)

Cryptographia vulgaris post adventum computrorum quantalium peribit.

RSA et ECC intra minutas frangentur.

Ideo Imarch normam postquantalem adhibet, a NIST acceptam:

CRYSTALS-Dilithium

Hoc praebet:

• resistentiam contra effractionem quantalem
• conservationem documentorum longaevam
• verificabilitatem per decennia in futurum

Subscriptio servatur:

• in subdomine
• in profilium
• in basi systematis verificationum
• in actibus QR

👉 Haec est protectio tui futuri digitalis.

Schema Citationis: Retransmissio ut Actus Agnitionis

In Web2 retransmissio — simplex est transmissio.

In imarch.sbs — actus agnitionis est:

1. Larva originale publicat
2. Utens illud in suo profilium citat
3. Citatio subscribitur
4. Systema “quis quem agnoverit” figit

Hoc est:

• documentum
• vestigium digitale
• actus famae
• nexus inter duo subiecta

Revera est systema “minime scientificum” citationis, ad ambitum socialem accommodatum.

Ludification Fidei et Referralizatio

Systema aedificat:

• Numeros Fidei — quotiens publicationes tuae citatae sunt.
• Circulos Referrales — quos in systema adduxisti.
• Gradus Subiectivitatis — Tiro → Activator → Operator → Particeps → Subiectum Fidei.

Haec mechanisma non ut crepundia operantur, sed ut instrumenta incrementi famae digitalis.

Quomodo Imarch a Facebook Differt

Facebook est:

• tumultus contenti
• algorithmi
• postes evanescentes
• absentia auctoris
• impossibilitas probandi originem

Imarch est:

• subiectum → larva
• originale → subscriptio
• retransmissio → actus agnitionis
• profilium → fenestra fidei
• systema → architectura actionum documentatarum

Metaphorae

• Cassa ludicra vs apparatus ratiocinarii
• Gladius plasticus vs arma bellica in censu
• “Apparatus medici” puerilis vs theatrum operationis verum
• Tela per numeros vs pictura artificis
• Inscriptio in saepem vs documentum notarii confirmatum
• Constructor Lego vs projectus architecturae

👉 Una exemplum est tumultus. Secunda est structura.

Plattaforma, ubi Quisque Subiectum Fit

Profilium personale et situs subdominis larvae — sunt:

• subiectivitas
• auctoritas digitalis
• probabilitas originis
• rete fidei
• systema famae
• subscriptio postquantalis

Imarch est transitus a ludo ad institutum, a tumultu ad structuram, ab utente ad subiectum.

Personal Profile, Subdomain Mask and Post-Quantum Signature as the Basis of Digital Subjectivity

In the world of social networks, a person has ceased to be a subject.
They have become a stream of content that disappears in the general noise. Posts drown in news feeds, authorship is blurred, reposts have no legal force, and the trust system is built on likes, attention speed, and algorithms.

The imarch.sbs platform was created as an alternative to this entire “empty game of communication.”
Not as another social network, but as an institutional architecture of trust, where:

• every act has a form
• every subject has a mask
• every post has a signature
• every repost becomes an act of citation

This is not an attempt to “improve Facebook.”
This is a step aside: from entertainment to responsible digital actions.

Why the World Needs an Architecture of Trust

The modern digital environment suffers from three fundamental problems:

Loss of Authorship

It is impossible to prove who published a text first.
Easy to delete, copy, forge.

Lack of Verifiability

A like or repost confirms nothing.
It is not an act of recognition, not a document, not evidence.

Collapse of Web2 Trust

Centralized platforms own algorithms, data, contexts.

And therefore, they own information.

The user here is merely a “passenger on public transport.”

The Imarch Concept: Subjectivity through a Scenic Mask

In Imarch, a subject is a mask possessing:

• a digital office (subdomain site and email)
• a signature
• a history of documents
• verification acts
• reputation
• a circle of trust

A mask is not a faceless nickname.
It is a digital form recognized by the system.

Just as in classical institutions:
title → responsibility → right to publish → right to sign acts.

Subdomain Site of the Mask: Birthplace of the Original

Each mask receives its address:

maskname.imarch.sbs

Here originals are published: articles, acts, memoranda, statements.

Each original has:

• a public key
• a post-quantum signature (CRYSTALS-Dilithium)
• a hash code for content verification
• a link to the verifier

Any reader can verify: signed by whom, when published, whether the text was altered.

👉 This turns a digital document into an act, not a post.

Personal Profile: The Citadel of Trust

A user’s information feed in Imarch is not a blog, but a “Citadel of Trust.”

Here:

• reposts → citation acts are displayed
• connections → circles of trust are visible
• participation in the system is recorded
• a reputational trail is collected

The profile is an interface, not the subject.

The subject is a verifiable scenic mask.

Post-Quantum Signature (CRYSTALS-Dilithium)

Conventional cryptography will die after the advent of mass quantum computers.

RSA and ECC will be cracked in minutes.

Therefore, Imarch uses a post-quantum standard adopted by NIST:

CRYSTALS-Dilithium

It provides:

• resistance to quantum hacking
• long-term document storage
• verifiability for decades to come

The signature is stored:

• on the subdomain
• in the profile
• in the system verification database
• in QR acts

👉 This protects your digital future.

Citation Scheme: Repost as an Act of Recognition

In Web2, a repost is simply a forward.

In imarch.sbs, it is an act of recognition:

1. A mask publishes an original
2. A user cites it in their profile
3. The citation is signed
4. The system records “who recognized whom”

This is:

• a document
• a digital trace
• a reputational act
• a connection between two subjects

Essentially, it is a “mini-scientific” citation system adapted to the social environment.

Gamification of Trust and Referralization

The system builds:

• Trust Counters — how many times your publications were cited.
• Referral Circles — whom you brought into the system.
• Subjectivity Levels — Novice → Activator → Operator → Participant → Subject of Trust.

These mechanisms work not as toys, but as tools for digital reputation growth.

How Imarch Differs from Facebook

Facebook is:

• content noise
• algorithms
• disappearing posts
• absence of an author
• inability to prove origin

Imarch is:

• subject → mask
• original → signature
• repost → act of recognition
• profile → showcase of trust
• system → architecture of documented actions

Metaphors

• Toy cash register vs accounting apparatus
• Plastic sword vs registered combat weapon
• “Doctor’s kit” for children vs real operating theater
• Paint-by-numbers vs artist’s painting
• Graffiti on a fence vs notarized document
• Lego constructor vs architectural project

👉 One model is noise. The second is structure.

A Platform Where Everyone Becomes a Subject

Personal profile and subdomain site of the mask are:

• subjectivity
• digital authorship
• provability of origin
• trust network
• reputation system
• post-quantum signature

Imarch is a transition from play to institution, from noise to structure, from user to subject.

2790654b92589fbe8f693e613af2992f43d4116d643bf855e34a58ba4e3bf439