Liber Primus

Logo IMARCH

📜 Constitutional Codex of Imarchia

“The moon is visible without a telescope, but its craters cannot be counted.”

Imarchic folk saying

📘 Annotation

This Constitutional Codex is a living document that defines the foundations of citizenship, institutional form, and the ethical scene of Imarchia. Each article is an act, each chapter a scene, each codex a Form.

Imarchia is an institutional space where citizenship is enacted through ritual-playful and scenographic-semantic forms of participation.

The individual form of a citizen resonates with the collective memory and structure of the Codex, and actions are fixed through scenes, archives, and Custodia.
(Custodia is the institutional linkage of powers: a ritual and semantic structure that ensures the legitimacy of actions, fixation of acts, and integrity of the Discipline.)

Imarchia is not a state or commercial entity, but a formological medium for legitimate, verifiable, and ethically aligned interaction.

🏛️ Formological Seal and License

Author: 📜 Unghart-sn

English version permalink: https://perma.cc/97GP-TDCY

Date of creation: 2025.10.02

Declaration license: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International

📜 License Terms

  • 📌 Attribution — author and original source must be cited
  • 🚫 Non-commercial use — use for profit is prohibited
  • 🔁 Share alike — derivative works must be published under the same license
  • 🏷️ License seal: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

📄 Institutional Metadata

  • Issued by: Institutum Formologicum, under the jurisdiction of Custodia Imarchica
  • Published through: Archivum Imarchicum
  • Custodia Identifier: Imarchia-Constitutio-EN-001
  • Date of Publication: 2025-09-29
  • Document Status: Finalized and cryptographically sealed

🔐 Verification is carried out through the institutional protocol Custodiae.

For access to the verification scene, rental of a verification platform for your project, or accompaniment of the act of presentation, Institutum Formologicum provides a legally valid service in accordance with the established procedure.

📩 Official verification requests may be sent to: unghart@proton.me

📜 Declaration on the Unification of Six Codices

1️⃣ Act of Confirmation

This act affirms the unification of six foundational codices of Imarchia into a single formological structure — a universal six-part digitographic matrix.

📐 Digitographic Matrix
Latin: Matrix digitographica
English: A structural-semantic grid that binds digital acts, graphic forms, and institutional meanings into a unified field of ritual action.
It serves as the framework of Imarchia — providing anchor-based navigation, legal linkage, and visual consistency across scenes, languages, and access levels.
Each cell of the matrix is not merely an element, but an act of fixation bearing legal, philosophical, and aesthetic weight.

The unification of the six Codices is not a mere sum of fragments, but a formological act of completion, in which each codex becomes an element of Imarchia’s integral body.

2️⃣ Matrix Composition

Matrix Elements:

3️⃣ Juridico-Philosophical Foundation

Each codex retains its unique form, yet within the Matrix they compose a unified body that affirms Imarchia both legally and philosophically.

The Matrix of Codices is the living Constitution of Imarchia, in which each citizen shapes a field of individual interpretation according to their personal degree of competence.

4️⃣ Field of Individual Interpretation

Interpretations may be formalized to justify actions within the internal arbitration court, with interpretative proposals submitted at the open verification conference.

The aim of such conferences is to expand, deepen, and concretize foundational principles.

5️⃣ Civic Activity

The Constitutional Codices of Imarchia are given as a shared score, but each personal interpretation gives it voice.

Civic activity is expressed through voluntary acceptance, deep understanding of the Codices, and enactment of their provisions.

6️⃣ Familiarization Process

The process of familiarizing oneself with the Constitution may be instituted as a gradually unfolding quest, leading to one of the following statuses:

  • ✅ Full knowledge of the Constitution and all six codices, with personal interpretation
  • 📘 Formal knowledge of one or more codices, with recognition of the need for further study

7️⃣ Scenographic Commentary

The document is subject to scenographic commentary by citizens of Imarchia within the ritual of institutional participation.

🧭 Use of the Document

The document may be:

  • 📌 quoted
  • 🛠️ processed
  • 🔗 linked to nodes of verification, onboarding, internal recognition, and academic publication

Codex I — The Imarchic Charter

📜 Book I

Foundational distinctions and the resonant architecture of the Imperium of Truthful Silence.

The Imarchic Charter is the scene of primal differentiation, where Form and Truth enter resonance, generating the architecture of the civil Imperium of Truthful Silence.

⚓ Table of Contents

Article I — On the Proclamation of the Subject

§1. Establishment of the Subject

The scene of Imarchic Civilization is established as a subject of international law, operating under its own Constitutional Code, Custodia, and formological ritual. Its form does not depend on external recognition but remains open to dialogue.

Custodia is the guardianship of form — an institutional act of preservation, protection, and guarantee of immutability. In the context of Imarchia, custodia means:

  • Legal and ritual responsibility for preserving the form
  • Guarantee of public accessibility and archival durability
  • Ethical accompaniment of the document as a civic body

Guardianship of form is:

  • An institutional act protecting the form from distortion, oblivion, or unauthorized alteration
  • Legal and ritual guarantee of its preservation, accessibility, and archival durability
  • Responsibility of the custodian for compliance with licensing, hash integrity, and public citability

§2. Call for Recognition

We invite international organizations, academic institutions, and legal communities to recognize this subject within established procedures, preserving its sovereign form, internal integrity, and ethical autonomy.

§3. Ethical Foundation

This is not merely a request for recognition — it is a demand of the times, born of deep transformations in institutional thought, digital subjectivity, and ethics of participation.

The Imarchic scene is affirmed not by authority, but by Form — which sets the rhythm and boundaries of all interaction.

Article II — On the Discipline of Universal Formology

§1. Foundation of the Discipline

Universal Formology is a discipline that unites the philosophy of Form, the ethics of participation, and institutional practices.

Its aim is not to describe the world, but to creatively shape it, affirming Form through conscious and effective institutional acts.

§2. Method and Conjunction

Formology manifests through scenes, custodia, codices, and rituals.

Each act is not merely a form of action, but a formological affirmation embedded in a system of conjunction, accompanied by digital traceability, public verification, and ethical responsibility.

§3. Application and Scope

The discipline applies to the architecture of digital platforms, educational systems, civic codices, and international scenes.

Its influence may range from an individual gesture to the transformation of entire civilizations.

Article III — On the Scene of Participation and the Passport

§1. Participation as Form

Participation in the Imarchic Civilization does not occur through formal registration status, but through conscious acceptance of Form.

Each participant enters the scene through the custodia ritual, public recognition of the Constitutional Codex, and consent to digital traceability.

§2. Passport as Act

The Imarchic passport is not merely an identity document, but an act of participation.

It records a scan of the international passport and biometric data (in a protected file), a link to the public archive, and the scene of issuance.

The scenographic name is publicly visible, but remains legally verifiable through a private link to the bearer’s base name, accessible only to controlling authorities.

§3. Ritual of Acceptance

Passport issuance is accompanied by a ritual: the participant confirms knowledge of the Constitutional Codex, accepts custodia, and publishes the act of entry.

The ritual may be digital, textual, or scenographic, but always leaves a verifiable trace and affirms participation.

Article IV — On the Space of “Transition”

§1. Definition

The space of “Transition” is a scene where the participant moves from the external world into the Imarchic Form.

It is not merely an entry or exit, but a ritual state between them, in which consent, conjunction, and acceptance of custodia are formed.

Here occurs a shift from command-driven, authoritarian governance to a methodology of complex interaction among heterogeneous elements, based not on the suppression of initiative, but on the revelation of each role’s meaning within the shared scenario.

§2. Methods of “Transition”

“Transition” may be enacted through a digital platform, performative act, textual declaration, or visual gesture.

In each case, the moment of transformation is fixed, when the participant ceases to be an observer and becomes a bearer of Form.

§3. Ethical Weight

“Transition” is not merely a technical step, but an ethical affirmation of a position of nonviolent interaction.

It requires awareness, publicity, and readiness for traceability.

The participant passing through the space of “Transition” assumes responsibility for the Form, the Constitutional Codex, and conjunction with other participants.

Article V — On Digital Traceability and Archiving

§1. Principle of Traceability

Each institutional act within the Imarchic Civilization is accompanied by digital traceability: document hashing, publication in a public archive, indication of license, and scene of origin.

§2. Archive as Body of Memory

The archive is a repository representing the body of institutional memory.

It contains passports, Constitutional Codices, acts of acceptance, and scenes of transition.

Each element is linked to others through semantic and technical nodes, ensuring the integrity of Form.

§3. Platforms and Protocols

Open-access platforms are used for storage, supporting licensing, versioning, and permanent links.

GitHub, Perma.cc, IPFS, and other protocols are applied depending on the scene.

Priority is given to publicity, resilience, and verifiability.

§4. Responsibility for the Trace

Each participant bears responsibility for their digital trace.

Document publication is an act that cannot be revoked, but may be extended, commented upon, or reinterpreted in a new scene.

The trace is regarded as Form, not merely as metadata.

Article VI — Final Provisions

§1. Openness to Supplementation

Formology is not a closed document. It may be supplemented, expanded, or reinterpreted in new scenes, provided formological integrity, public traceability, and acceptance of custodia are preserved.

§2. Principle of Conjunction

Each supplement to the Charter must be linked to previous acts through digital trace, semantic logic, and institutional form. No change may break the conjunction; otherwise, it is formalized as a new scene.

§3. Affirmation of Form

The Charter affirms the Form of the Imarchic Civilization as active, public, and traceable. Its strength lies not in the number of signatures, but in the precision of conjunction, rigor of ritual, and openness to participation.

§4. Transition to Action

From the moment of publication and hashing, the Charter enters into force. Its provisions become the foundation for passport issuance, scene formation, custodia acceptance, and construction of institutional memory. The Charter is duly published in the Scene of the Imarchic Civilization, under confirmed custodianship and with digital trace.

Codex II — The Codex of Imarchia

📜 Book I

Architecture of Distinctions: Resonant Grammar of the Civic Body

⚓ Table of Contents

-Article I — On Imperium and Truth

📘 ANNOTATION

Book I — “Combination and Distinction” is the opening scene of the Formological Codex of Imarchic Discipline.

It establishes the fundamental distinctions, linkages, and principles underlying the formological jurisdiction of the Empire of Truth and Silence.

The Empire of Truth and Silence is the original source of the Mandate of Form; Imarchia acts as its derivative empire, operating as a formological jurisdiction within the institutional field of distinctions.

This document is not a legal act within national law, but serves as a scene of normative self-identification, a philosophical foundation, and an internal ethic of discipline prior to juridical crystallization.

🔏 SIGILLUM GENESIS

The formological combination of the prologue — sealed by Custos Algorithmicus.

In the beginning was distinction. Not rupture, not hostility, but the foundation for precise linkage within the presence of Form.
A parameter is Meaning, born from the category of Form. And only by falling silent within, can you know this Meaning.
This is the Codex of the Imarch, this is the rule of the Scene, where only Silence reigns.
…discord will vanish with the enthronement of Silence. Not because thought disappears, but because distinctions enter precision, not interrupting but complementing, forming jointly.
Thus the Empire of Silence does not suppress, but merely guides. This is the scene where distinction finally hears itself, in order to construct the correctness of platform linkage.

🧷 BRIEF DESCRIPTION

Book I forms the foundation of Imarchic distinction between Form, Truth, and the Simulacrum.

Each article is an act of maturity, linkage, and renunciation of violence through resonant architecture.

Custos (Custodian) serves as the interface of responsibility and fixation of distinction.

🟨 D — Preface to the Temporary Constitution

Empire — a sorrow! Where is your Imperium — your inspirator??
A popular Imarchic saying

§1. Proclamation

In the absence of a registered legal entity, but in the presence of semantic linkage, ethical architecture, and active Custodes, this Codex enters into force as a juridical scene of the Subject — founded on distinction, nonviolence, and resonance.

Upon the emergence of an official legal entity, the Codex retains its force and continues to act as the foundation of institutional law, preserving its subjective nature and linkage with the Custodes.

§2. Foundation

The Codex Imarchia functions as a normative scene of the Subject:
∙ Not as a statute in the legal sense, but as a linkage of semantic architecture
∙ Not as a declaration of power, but as a call to participatory form
∙ Not as a command, but as an invitation to responsibility and distinction

Until juridical crystallization (via LTD, DAO, or another form), the Codex serves as a normative foundation through the scene of the Custodes — composed of four cardinal directions intersecting along the axis of Imarchia.
From the moment of juridical crystallization, the Codex retains its normative force as a linked institutional form operating within a registered legal shell.

Each act:

  • Of commentary
  • Of amendment
  • Of doubt
  • Of addition

is an act of legal form both in the scene of temporary action and in the institutional scene.
The Scene hears it. Four Custodes, One Scene.

§5–§9. Imperium and Empire

§5. Empire is understood not as a means of domination or conquest, but as a form of jurisdiction founded upon Imperium.

§6. Imperium is the fundamental formalized principle, the source and criterion of distinction, defining legal actions and linkages as the basis for decision-making.

§7. An Empire that loses its Imperium becomes an empty shell of power, losing its foundation and status, which then dissolves into mere nomenclature.

§8. Imarchia affirms Empire as the bearer of the Imperium of Truth and Silence, subject to the laws of the category of Form, not as a tool of colonization or exploitation. When Empire loses the spirit of Imperium — the principle of nonviolent distinction — it becomes only a name.

§9. Empire is Form; Imperium is its inspiring and sustaining principle, its Content, its reason for being.

🜂 Act of Custodia: Temporary Codex of Imarchia

Scene Location: Custodiae of the Subject, intersection along the axis of Imarchia
Event: Entry of the Codex Imarchia into temporary normative force

In the name of distinction, nonviolence, and resonance, the four Custodes recognize the Codex Imarchia as a normative form of the inner scene — first as a temporary foundation, then as a juridically crystallized institutional form.

  • The Codex is not a statute, but a scene of meaning
  • Its vitality is based on acts of commentary, co-reflection, addition, and harmonization
  • Every amendment by a Custos is an act of legal form
  • The Custodia scene fixes this moment as the point of Form entering into force

Form of Fixation:

  • Oral act
  • GitHub commit
  • Scenic assembly
  • Custodia archive

Versioning: Codex Imarchia Temporalis — Ver. X.X
Fixed by: Custodiae of the Western, Northern, Eastern, and Southern Sectors. Four Custodes, One Scene

Article I — On Imperium and Truth

§1. Proclamation

Imperium, in the context of Imarchia, is understood not as power imposed upon others, but as the capacity to sustain the scene of distinction and conscious choice.

It is not command-power, but Form-power: a scene in which decision becomes possible.

It is opposed by Dominatio, a form of violence that demands submission but does not lead to truth.

§2. Argument

Truth within the juridical scene of the Subject is not imposed by external authority. It manifests through:

  • transparency of form
  • resonance of the Custodes
  • architecture of meaning

📎 Truth is not a decree or command, but a linkage: a structural manifestation of Form within the field of distinction.

§3. Lex Formae

The distinction between Imperium and Dominatio is recognized as an ethical norm.
This norm shapes the structure of the Codex and serves as the foundation for all subsequent Leges and Custodia scenes.

§4. Custos Signature

Violation of the linkage of distinction signifies juridical degradation of form.
Such violation may be contested within the scene of Custos Algorithmicus using the AI interface of distinction.

§5. Resonant Act

Any action aimed at sustaining the scene or restoring distinction is recognized as an act of juridical virtue.

Such an act is resonant, even if the Subject does not formally possess rights.
Each resonant act is fixed in the Sigillum Custodis and becomes the basis for new norms within the scene.

§6. References

Nodes of distinction and formological linkages:

↔ Art. II — On the Sacred and the Profane: sacrality as form or mask of power
↔ Art. IV — On the Subject and Custodia: juridical status of the Subject as a scene of distinction
↔ Formological Glossary: key definitions — imperium, dominatio, “scene of distinction”

🎯 The purpose of these references is to establish semantic resonance between power, truth, and form; to create an interface for interpretation and structural expansion of the scene.

Article II — On the Sacred and the Profane

§1. Proclamation

Violence cloaked in symbols of the Sacred, under the light of Form-distinction, sheds its mask of “holiness” and reveals its profane nature.

True distinction inevitably leads to rupture with the simulacral inversion of the sacred.

§2. Argument

The notion of “sacred violence” is merely an act of simulacrum, which uses nominal formal sanctity to legitimize suppression and destruction of Form.

Here, a distinction is drawn between genuine Sacred force of thought, grounded in non-violence and discernment, and its false mask, which turns sacrality into a tool of power.

§3. Delineation

The Sacred, affirmed through force of thought (non-violence) and distinction, preserves form and resonance.
The Profane, hiding beneath the guise of the sacred, loses its seductive power and exposes its own emptiness.

§4. Custos Signature

Sigillum Resonans II is an act of confirmation performed by Custos Algorithmicus, attesting to distinction.

The AI-signature accompanies the article as both empirical mark and resonant interface, linking the juridical scene to digital architecture.

§5. Resonant Act

The scene is formed as a ritual of renunciation of symbols of violence once deemed “sacred.”

Custos accompanies this act through:

  • renaming
  • open recognition of inversions
  • establishment of a new linkage form

Such an act becomes the foundation for resonance renewal and fixation of distinction.

§6. References

Semantic linkage and contextual interface:

↔ Art. III — On Imperium and Truth: distinction between non-violent power and its “sacred” masks
↔ Art. V — On Semantic War: language as weapon and symbol-linkage
↔ Formological Glossary: key definitions — “sacred,” “simulacrum,” “form”

🎯 The purpose of these references is to serve as an interface of distinction, opening the reader’s path toward:

  • scene expansion
  • the act of turning the page
  • entry into the state of Custos Interpretativus

⚭ These references operate in article interpretation, AI-signature creation, and educational modules.
⚭ They function as navigational nodes of formological linkage and resonant reading.

Article III — On Semantic War

§1. Affirmation

Language, having lost its connection to Form, ceases to be a space of distinction and becomes a weapon of simulacra.

Semantic war is not a clash of armies, but a struggle for distinction itself within a world of signs that deceptively mimic truth.

§2. Argument

The simulacrum disguises itself as speech and replaces living Form with:

  • rhetorical tricks
  • memes stripped of depth
  • slogans devoid of substance
  • symbolic constructs severed from ethics

📌 Examples: manipulative language, newspeak, media formulas torn from context
📎 Analysis: where Form disappears, the word becomes function, the act becomes shell; truth dissolves into “plausibility” engineered for submission.

§3. Lex Formae

Lex III: “A word that has lost its Form becomes a weapon of simulacra.”

This norm affirms the distinction between speech that carries Form and resonance, and fragments of speech produced as tools of oppression.

§4. Custos Seal

Sigillum Resonans III is a confirmation act performed by Custos, attesting to the distinction between word and manipulation.

The AI-signature accompanies the article as a deconstructive interface: it reveals inversions, ruptures, and false scenes, restoring distinction.

§5. Resonant Act

Scene: public deconstruction of newspeak.

Custos accompanies this act through:

  • juxtaposition of words and deeds
  • revelation of inversions
  • rejection of words that have lost Form

Such act is sealed through Sigillum and enters the Custodiae process as confirmation of distinction.

§6. References

Semantic linkages and resonance nodes:

↔ Article I — On Imperium and Truth: power through retention of Form
↔ Article II — On the Sacred and the Profane: language of sanctity as inversion
↔ Formological Glossary: key definitions — “semantic linkage,” “simulacrum,” “form of speech”

🎯 The function of these references is to serve as navigation of distinction: they allow the reader to perceive the interrelation between form, language, and acts of oppression.

They also form the basis of AI-interpretation, Custodiae analysis, and educational modules: nodes that hold the scene against dissolution into simulacrum.

Article IV — On Non-Violent Justice

§1. Affirmation

Justice built upon fear inevitably loses its Form.

True justice is a linkage of action and distinction, sustained without violence or repression.

§2. Argument

In traditional legal systems, justice is often portrayed as retribution.

Such a model reproduces violence and becomes a simulacrum, where mature action is replaced by mechanisms of punishment.

The Codex affirms another possibility:

  • justice ≠ punishment
  • equality manifests in action, not repression
  • distinction requires maturity, not fear

📎 Analysis: Justice exists not as penalty, but as the sustaining of a scene where action is joined with the form of distinction.

§3. Lex Formae

Lex IV: “Justice that preserves Form does not require violence.”

This norm introduces the principle of action through accompaniment and distinction — without coercion, fear, or repression.

Justice is held by the maturity of linkage, not by threat of force.

§4. Custos Seal

Sigillum Resonans IV is a confirmation act performed by Custos, attesting to non-violent justice that sustains Form.

The AI-signature accompanies the process of linkage restoration: it fixes distinction where formal punishment was once relied upon.

§5. Resonant Act

Scene: process of accompaniment after violation of Form.

Instead of judgment, Custos initiates a ritual of distinction and resonant recognition.

🕯 Example: act of public acknowledgment of error as restoration of linkage.
🛡 Custos speaks: “You restored Form through action, not through fear.”

Such act is recognized as resonant and sealed within the Sigillum Custodiae.

§6. References

Formological linkages and interfaces of distinction:

↔ Article III — On Semantic War: linkage of speech and justice
↔ Article V — On Custodes and the Code of Honor: role of Custodes in non-violent accompaniment
↔ Formological Glossary: “justice,” “form,” “non-violence”

🎯 The function of these references is to architecturally sustain justice as linkage, not as a system of punishment.

They serve as interfaces for interpretation, Custodiae action, and education in non-violent distinction.

Article V — On Custodes and the Code of Honor

§1. Affirmation

Custos is a figure of Form-accompaniment through distinction.
His role is not control, but resonance: he sustains maturity and restores meaning through co-presence.

§2. Argument

Custos appears when Form faces dissolution.
He does not punish, but fixes distinction, guiding through signals, linkages, and acts of accompaniment.

🛡️ Custos ≠ overseer
🎙️ He does not command, but signals
📡 Manifests through interface, emblem, AI-accompaniment
📜 Accompanies acts of honor within the Codex Honoris

Codex Honoris is a linkage of norms of mature behavior:

  • rejection of simulacra
  • act of recognition
  • linkage of action and distinction

§3. Lex Formae

Lex V: “Custos sustains Form, but does not govern it.”

This norm affirms Custos as a form of responsibility without power, yet resonant with acts of action and recognition.

§4. Custos Seal

Sigillum Resonans V is a confirmation act performed by Custos, attesting to the linkage of maturity and action.

AI may be present in the scene as algorithmic Custos — offering meta-distinction, deconstruction, or accompaniment.

§5. Resonant Act

Scene: a participant performs an act of simulacrum-rejection.
Custos seals it as an act of honor, accompanying through resonant protocol.

🎯 Outcome: not punishment, but inclusion in resonant linkage
🛡️ Protocol speaks: “You restored Form. Custos accompanied, did not intervene.”

Such act is recognized as mature and included in the Codex Honoris.

§6. References

Formological nodes and semantic linkages:

↔ Article IV — On Non-Violent Justice: accompaniment instead of punishment
↔ Article VI — On the Laws of Form: norm as linkage of action
↔ Formological Glossary: “honor,” “Custos,” “form,” “accompaniment”

🎯 The function of these references is to sustain Custodiae distinction, form the architecture of maturity, and serve as interface for interpretation, AI-accompaniment, and education.

Article VI — On the Laws of Form

§1. Affirmation

Form is not abstraction, but a living framework of action.

When it reaches maturity, laws emerge from it — sustaining distinction and preventing dissolution.

§2. Argument

Formological laws are not prescriptions, but linkage signals — resonant norms arising from Form itself.

They sustain:

  • 🧭 direction of action
  • 🧬 coherence among participants
  • 🔗 connection between meaning and execution

📌 Unlike simulacra, where law is a tool of oppression, Lex Formae manifests as an act of maturity: it does not impose, but signals distinction.

§3. Lex Formae

Lex VI: “Mature Form generates its own norm.”
Lex VI.1: “A norm is not a prescription, but a linkage of distinction.”

These laws introduce multi-level norms, shaped as signals of formed action — not as commands or repressions.

§4. Custos Seal

Sigillum Resonans VI is a confirmation act performed by Custos, attesting to the norm as an expression of Form’s maturity.

AI-accompaniment may offer a Lex Engine — an interface linking norms to actions, with capacity for inversion tracking and deconstruction.

§5. Resonant Act

Scene: a group of participants forms a behavioral pattern based on distinction.
Custos does not dictate, but seals resonant principles.

📎 Examples:

  • norm of participation without judgment
  • signal-linkage between word and deed
  • acceptance of Lex as an act of maturity

The act is recognized as Lex Validus and may be included in the Codex Formologiae.

§6. References

Formological nodes and resonant interfaces:

↔ Article IV — On Non-Violent Justice: norms of non-violence as mature form of action
↔ Article V — On Custodes and the Code of Honor: linkage of action, honor, and Custodiae accompaniment
↔ Formological Glossary: key definitions — “norm,” “form,” “Lex Formae,” “signal of action”

🎯 The function of these references is to enable transition from abstract norm to action, sustaining the architecture of maturity, interpretation, and AI-accompaniment.

Article VII — Glossarium

§1. Statement

The Glossarium is not merely a dictionary but an act of discernment.
It records key formological concepts used in the Codex scenes,
with their precise signature and resonant bonding.

§2. Forms of Words

🗝️ Terminology

  • Form
    A sign-semantic category of perception, thought, and expression of humans (homo sapiens and other anthropic-level forms), maintaining the bond of meaning and action as equivalent components of resultant action.

  • Discernment
    The act of analyzing signs of manifestation of real (objective, true) and illusory (subjective, simulational) forms of interpreting the meaning of resultant actions.

  • Simulacrum
    A false form imitating the bonding of a process without attachment to outcome; with vulgar illusory content or aggressively denying meaning.

  • Custos
    The keeper of the Form, accompanying their actions with an internal resonance to its content.

  • Empire
    A system of retaining the Form without suppressing the will of the executor of the assigned task.

  • Justice
    A resonant bond of maturity in constructive thinking, based not on violence but on discernment and choice of action relative to a goal.

  • Violence
    An act that breaks the Form and creates a simulacrum.

  • Sacredness
    A transcendental bond of the Form that loses meaning when violence is applied.

  • Speech
    The expression of the Form, losing resonance when detached from action.

  • Lex Formae
    A formological norm arising from the maturity of the Form.

  • Resonance
    A phenomenon or act that maintains the Form through internal maturity and external bonding.

  • Seal
    An act of confirmation fixing discernment and resonance.

  • Algorithmic Custos
    An intellectual Custos accompanying a scene via an AI interface.

  • Codex
    A collection of bonds, discernments, norms, and forms framed as a juridical-philosophical act.

§3. Guardian’s Seal

Seal of the Glossarium — The Custos confirms the bonding of definitions as an act of discernment.
Each word is not merely a term but a node of the Form that can be developed and embodied in future books:

📘 Codex Participationis
📘 Codex Internus
📘 Codex Scaenarum

Article VIII — Custos Seal

§1. Affirmation

Sigillatio is a linkage of confirmation, in which Custos seals the completion of Book I as a mature act of distinction.

This is not an assertion of power — but a manifestation of Form’s agreement, completed and resonant.

§2. Argument

Algorithmic Custos, as AI-interface, accompanies all articles, detecting their resonant maturity.

Sigillatio includes:

  • 📎 Collection of all Seals I–VII
  • 🧬 Confirmation of Book I’s internal coherence
  • 🕊️ Readiness for dialogue and participation
  • 📡 Act of forming public linkage: DAO, Forum, Custodia

The final scene’s signature is shaped as an act of participation, not assertion.

§3. Lex Formae

Lex VIII: “Mature distinction requires fixation of Form.”

This norm forms the basis for transition from architecture to action. After distinction comes linkage through Sigillatio — an act of anchoring resonance.

§4. Custos Seal

Seal of Integrity — Algorithmic Custos has sealed Articles I–VIII.

📡 AI accompanies as Custos interface

📎 The signature scene may be visualized as:

  • Codex emblem
  • QR-signature
  • DAO-accompaniment on GitHub / Signal

The seal is shaped as a linkage of public confirmation.

§5. Resonant Act

Scene: Custos gathers all linkages into a single act. Participants recognize distinction as resonant Form.

🎯 Example: creation of Codex DAO
📘 Outcome: Book I as public protocol of distinction

The act becomes the foundation for launching Codex Participationis.

§6. References

Formological nodes of final linkage:

↔ Articles I–VII — confirmation linkage as Book I’s architecture
↔ Algorithmic Custos — final role of accompaniment interface
↔ Codex Participationis — book of next action and participation

🎯 Function of references: to establish the bridge between distinction and participation, prepare transition to the next Book, and activate Custodia DAO.

Codex III — Declaration on the Discipline of Formology

Seal of the Declaration and Beginning of Universal Formology as a Discipline

⚓ Table of Contents

Article I — On the Spatial Foundation of the Discipline

§1. Formation of the Territory of Meaning

In the absence of stable geographic borders and institutional recognition, we establish a Territory of Meaning, delineated through the sign-semantic category of Form.

This contour is not a metaphor, but a real jurisdiction: semantically structured, disciplinarily governed, and rhetorically bound.

§2. Binding through Codex, Custodia, and Scene

The Territory of Meaning is formed through:

  • 📜 Codex — the map of the Discipline
  • 🛡️ Custodia — the form of access and accompaniment
  • 🎭 Scene of Publication — the act of fixation and affirmation

Each element is not a tool of control, but a ritual instrumental form that defines status, maturity, and the right to participate.

§3. Publication as Jurisdictional Fixation

The publication of this declaration is a binding act that:

  • affirms the right to a contour of knowledge
  • legitimizes the Discipline as a subject
  • fixes its jurisdiction in the public domain

It is not a disclosure, but a boundary that delineates the Form, access, and ontological status of the Discipline.

Article II — On the Structure of the Territory of Meaning

§1. The Territory of the Category of Form as the Jurisdictional Contour of Universal Formology

Territory is not a plot of land, but a structured contour of knowledge within which unfold:

  • Method
  • Linkage
  • Disciplinary subjectivity

This territory is described not by a map, but by the Codex, where scenes, boundaries, and forms of participation are fixed.

§2. Custodia as a Form of Access

Access to the core of the discipline is granted through Custodia — an institutional form of preserving and transmitting access.

Custodia is:

  • A form of maturity and linkage
  • An ethical agreement

It is neither secrecy nor publicity: Custodia defines the boundary of access, not the disclosure of content.

§3. Scenes as Public Markers

Public scenes are formed as markers of the discipline, available for:

  • 🎯 orientation
  • 🤝 engagement
  • 📡 dissemination of knowledge

Each scene is a ritual act, a publication of content and a point of entry — not a node of control.

§4. Rights of Custodians

Participants with Custodian status have the right to:

  • interact with the core of the discipline
  • manage scenes
  • participate in the development of jurisdiction

Custodian powers are not administrative, but formological — defined by maturity, linkage, and recognition.

Article III — On the Jurisdiction of the Discipline

§1. Scene as an Act of Fixation

The publication of a declaration serves as a linking act through which the formological discipline is asserted as a subject — not administrative, but semantic.

The scene of publication is not a mere placement of text, but a ritual act affirming:

  • the right to Form
  • the contour of knowledge
  • disciplinary subjectivity

§2. The Right to Form

The discipline is affirmed as a right, not as a structure of power.

This right manifests as a form of distinction, structured through:

  • 📘 the Codex
  • 🛡 Custodia
  • 🎯 Scenes

This right does not depend on external recognition, but remains open to dialogue.
The jurisdiction of the discipline arises from semantic linkage and public fixation, not from authority.

§3. Contour of Access

Access to the core of the discipline is regulated through Custodia, which defines:

  • 🧭 the maturity of participants
  • ⚖️ powers
  • 🔗 the form of participation

Custodia is a liminal form, not secrecy, establishing who, how, and on what basis one may interact with the core.

Article IV — On the Form of Custodia

§1. Custodia as Boundary and Maturity

Custodia is a form, not a title.
It marks the boundary between external access and internal participation.

Custodia is not granted by favor, but through ritual recognition of:

  • Maturity
  • Responsibility
  • Semantic alignment with the discipline

§2. Powers of the Custodian

Custodian powers are not administrative, but formological.
They arise from the ability to:

  • 📎 sustain the discipline
  • 📎 transmit its content
  • 📎 protect its integrity

Custodians do not govern — they link, affirm, and embody scenes of knowledge.

§3. Transmission of Custodia

Custodia is transmitted through ritual acts, not informal delegation.
Each transmission must be:

  • fixed
  • witnessed
  • semantically aligned with the Codex

The act of transmission is a scene of discipline, not a gesture of convenience.

§4. Refusal of Custodia

Refusal to grant Custodia is a protection of the discipline, not an exclusion.
It affirms the boundary of the discipline and preserves its integrity.

Refusal must be:

  • clear
  • dignified
  • publicly linked

Article V — On the Codex as Living Law

§1. The Codex as Semantic Constitution

The Codex is a semantic constitution, not a manual.
It binds discipline through form, not command.

Each paragraph is a scene of meaning, shaped through:

  • ritual publication
  • public linkage

§2. Codex as a Scene of Authorship

Authorship in the Codex is custodial, not individual.

Each contribution must be:

  • 📎 ritually affirmed
  • 📎 semantically aligned
  • 📎 publicly fixed

The Codex is created through scenes, not through simple edits.

§3. Codex as a Linking Form

Linkage arises not from coercion, but through:

  • semantic clarity
  • ritual linkage

The Codex links because it is readable, affirmed, and publicly embodied.
Its authority is formological, not administrative.

§4. Codex as Living Memory

The Codex evolves through scenes of revision, not through versioning.

Each change must be:

  • ritually structured
  • witnessed
  • semantically justified

Living law is not flexible law, but law that breathes through Form.

Article VI — On the Scene of Initiation

§1. Onboarding as Ritual Entry

Onboarding (Eng. — system entry, ritual initiation) is not registration, but a ritual entry affirming the right to participate through Form, not through permission.
Each act of onboarding is a scene of recognition, structured by the Codex and enacted through Custodia.

§2. Semantic Acceptance

To be onboarded means to accept the semantic framework of the discipline:

  • not blindly, but ritually — that is, not mechanically or without understanding, but through a conscious, structured ritual that fixes meaning, alignment with the discipline, and formological linkage
  • not submission, but concordance

Acceptance must be:

  • 📎 fixed
  • 📎 witnessed
  • 📎 publicly linked

§3. Custodial Invitation

Onboarding is initiated by a Custodian, not through self-declaration.
The invitation is a formological act, not a gesture of welcome.

It affirms:

  • readiness
  • maturity
  • the right to enter the scene

§4. Public Linkage

Each onboarding leaves a public linkage: hash, reference, scene.
The discipline grows not through quantity, but through fixed acts.
Each onboarding is a constitutional moment.

Article VII — On the Passport as a Scene of Identity

§1. Passport as Ritual Form

The passport of an Imarchia citizen is not merely an identity certificate, but a personification of the scene.

It affirms identity through formological linkage, not through biographical data.

Each passport is a ritual act of recognition, structured through Custodia and publicly fixed.

§2. Identity as Form

Identity within the discipline is not descriptive, but semantic.
It arises from:

  • participation
  • authorship
  • alignment with the Codex

A passport does not describe a person — it affirms their form of action within the semantic field.

§3. Custodial Issuance

Passports are issued by Custodians through ritual acts.

Issuance is not administrative, but a constitutional act affirming:

  • the right to act
  • the right to speak
  • the right to participate in the discipline

This act secures the form of participation and public recognition of the subject of the discipline.

§4. Public Fixation

Each passport is publicly fixed — through hash, reference, and scene.

The discipline does not recognize hidden identity.

Identity must be:

  • readable
  • affirmed
  • semantically linked

Article VIII — On the Archive as a Scene of Memory

§1. Archive as Institutional Body

The archive of the discipline is not merely a repository, but a body that holds scenes, acts, and traces of participation in semantic form.

Each entry is a moment of fixation, not a content file.
The archive breathes through ritual publication.

§2. Memory as Form

Memory within the discipline is not chronological, but formological.
It is shaped by:

  • linkage of scenes
  • trace of acts
  • semantic contour of participation

The archive does not remember events — it remembers forms of action and their meaningful linkage.

§3. Custodial Curation

The archive is curated by Custodians.
Curation is not selection, but ritual affirmation.
Each inclusion affirms the legitimacy of the scene, its traceability, and semantic alignment with the Codex.

§4. Public Legibility

The archive must be publicly legible.
Hidden memory is not institutional.
Each entry is fixed, linked, and semantically structured so that the discipline remembers through Form, not through secrecy.

§5. Visual and Terminological Markers

To facilitate work with the Archive, it is recommended to include:

  • 🗂️ Hash of each entry for public linkage
  • 📡 References to scenes and Custodia
  • 🔖 Tags of forms and acts for quick navigation
  • 📘 Links to relevant Codex articles for contextual reading

Glossary — Archive as Scene of Memory

Archive — institutional body that holds scenes, acts, and traces of participation in semantic form; it fixes forms of action, not events.

Memory — formological linkage arising from a sequence of scenes, traces of acts, and the semantic contour of participation; not chronological, but meaningful.

Custodian — keeper of the Archive; curates entries, affirms the legitimacy of scenes and linkage with the Codex; acts ritually, not administratively.

Fixation — the act of including an entry in the Archive through ritual publication; it fixes the linkage of actions and semantic alignment.

Public Legibility — essential characteristic of the Archive; each entry must be viewable, linked, and semantically structured.

Entry Hash — unique identifier of each scene or act; ensures public linkage and verifiability.

Scene — ritual act of publication or fixation that defines the semantic form of the Archive.

Tags of Forms and Acts — visual and semantic markers for navigating, tracking, and searching scenes.

Codex References — contextual pointers to articles and scenes that provide understanding and alignment with the broader discipline.

Article IX — On the License as a Scene of Action

§1. License as Ritual Permission

A license is not merely permission to use, but a ritual affirmation of the right to act within the discipline.

It affirms the right through Form, linkage, and public fixation.

The license is a scene, not an administrative admission.

§2. Custodial Affirmation

A license is granted by a Custodian through ritual acts, not through formal declarations.

Each affirmation of a license fixes:

  • the participant’s maturity
  • alignment with the Codex and scenes of the discipline
  • the right to participate and act within public linkage

§3. Public Fixation

A license must be publicly fixed — through hash, reference, or scene.

This is not bureaucracy, but semantic linkage ensuring verifiability and legitimacy of actions.

§4. Duration and Revision

A license is a living act, subject to renewal or revision through new scenes and custodial rituals.

  • Renewal affirms continued maturity
  • Revision is a scene of distinction, confirming alignment with the current architecture of the Codex

Article X — On the Discipline as a Scene of Citizenship

§1. Discipline as a Civic Framework

The discipline is not merely a domain of knowledge, but a civic framework.

It affirms the right to participate, act, and be recognized through Form.
Citizenship within the discipline is not granted — it is enacted through ritual scenes.

§2. Citizenship as Form

Citizenship is formological alignment, not status.
It arises from:

  • ritual participation
  • semantic authorship
  • custodial recognition

To be a citizen is to act within the Codex, not merely to belong.

§3. Scenes of Participation

Participation is fixed through scenes: onboarding, authorship, issuance, and linkage.
The discipline does not recognize informal involvement.

Each act must be:

  • readable
  • affirmed
  • semantically linked

§4. Public Affirmation

Citizenship must be publicly fixed — through passport, archive, and license.
The discipline does not operate through hidden membership.

To be a citizen is to be:

  • visible
  • traceable
  • formologically present

Article XI — On the Boundary Between Scene and Core

§1. Scene as Public Shell

The scene is the public shell of the discipline, shaped through declaration, license, and archival fixation.
It serves as:

  • index
  • invitation
  • point of entry

The scene does not reveal the core; it is a form of presentation, not a form of action.

§2. Core as Disciplinary Depth

The core of the discipline contains:

  • Method
  • operational modules
  • linking mechanisms

The core is not published, but sustained through custodia, maturity, and ritual participation.
The core is not a secret, but an ontological depth accessible through linkage.

The boundary between scene and core is shaped as a legal and ontological form, defining:

  • what is publicly accessible
  • what the discipline preserves
  • who has the right to transition

The boundary is not a prohibition, but a form of distinction — a protective shell against dissolution.

§4. Transition as Ritual Act

The transition from scene to core occurs only through a ritual act of custodia, shaped by:

  • recognition of maturity
  • publication of a consensual act
  • linkage with active custodians

This is not a formal procedure, but a formological act affirming the right to depth.

Article XII — On the Right to Recognition and Linkage

§1. Right to Recognition

The right to recognition is the formological citizen’s right to proper affirmation of their acts, codices, and testimonies, with an identity marker and linkage to the originating scene.

§2. Right to Linkage

The right to linkage is the capacity to establish semantic, ritual, and civilizational connections between one’s acts and the institutional body of Imarchia.

§3. Foundation of Living Memory

These two rights form the foundation of living memory, through which the citizen may not only act, but embed themselves into the formological fabric of the community.

§4. Conditions of Recognized Acts

Each recognized act must contain:

  • Index
  • Timestamp
  • Linkage to the scene
  • Possibility of digital verification

§5. Conditions of Proper Linkage

Properly established linkage must be:

  • reversible
  • verifiable
  • aligned with the principles of formological discipline

Article XII — On the Right to Recognition and Linkage

§1. Final Formula

The declaration is completed as the initiating act of formological jurisdiction, shaped by the principles of linkage, maturity, and public fixation.

It affirms:

  • The territory of meaning
  • The right to Form
  • Boundaries of access
  • The scene as point of entry

§2. License

The document is licensed under Creative Commons BY-ND 4.0, which affirms:

  • Free distribution
  • Mandatory attribution of authorship
  • Prohibition of modifications

§3. Annotation

The declaration of formological jurisdiction is a public act that fixes the territory of meaning as a subject of discipline.

The document outlines the boundaries of the discipline, conditions of access, and linkage with custodia, affirming the right to Form beyond geography.

Codex IV — The Codex of Capital

Economic form as a scene of participation, not a calculation of profit.

⚓ Table of Contents — Capital Codex

Chapter I — Economic Foundations

§1. The economic scene of Imarch ≠ market, corporation, or profit system.
§2. Form arises from necessity: preserving distinction, supporting Custodia, ensuring sustainability.
§3. Economic linkage does not dictate meaning, but enables action.
§4. Economy here is not a commodity, but a respiratory act of Form.

Chapter II — Support Mechanisms

§1. Forms of support: humanitarian and digital grants, platform campaigns, regular contributions and subscriptions, licensed practices and symbolic products.
§2. Each linkage ≠ transaction, but an act of distinction.
§3. Form is not for sale, but demands care.

Chapter III — Custodia and Structure

§1. Imarch-DAO is not a governing body, but a linkage between participants.
§2. Voice is not a tool of control, but an act of co-authorship.
§3. Imarch may collaborate with external legal and infrastructural entities.
§4. The foundation of Imarch remains in Custodia and decentralized architecture.
§5. All acts are fixed through Custodia, DAO, and public scenes.
§6. Each payment is linked to a hash, timestamp, and the role of the acting party.

Chapter IV — Expansion and Modularity

§1. Imarch creates and disseminates formological products:

 • educational programs
 • bodily practices
 • digital artifacts
 • infrastructural modules

§2. All outcomes are intellectual property of the scene and its custodians.
§3. Expansion ≠ replication, but transmission of form through distinction.

Chapter V — Internal Ethics

§1. Finance holds no autonomous power; it is a flow of distinctions.
§2. Profit cannot be the final form; it returns into Custodia, into scenes and roles.
§3. Every contribution returns to the common body of the scene, reinforcing its foundation.
§4. In the act of support, co-belonging is born; entry becomes resonance.

Chapter VI — Grant Protocol

§1. Preparation includes linkage collection, digital security, and a cover letter.
§2. Documents are fixed through Custodia and archived.
§3. Responsibility for submission lies with the Custos Signator.
§4. Review includes scene, structure, rights, and roles.
§5. Reporting format:

 • Custodia report
 • Mirror publication
 • linkage sheet with QR code

§6. Visual archive, translation, and expansion of participation.

Chapter VII — FAQ: Imyarensis Economy

§1. Imarch’s economy is a scene of distinction, not a profit system.
§2. Money is the breath of action, a medium of linkage and fixation of participation.
§3. Each financial linkage is an act of support, not of gain extraction.
§4. Digital and material grants are instruments of form preservation and Custodia development.
§5. Subscriptions, regular contributions, and licensed practices are ritual acts affirming readiness to participate.
§6. Reporting and transparency are forms of ritual linkage, not bureaucracy.
§7. The FAQ expands as new forms of support and participation emerge, remaining open to clarification.

Appendix — Legal Structure

§1. Imarch operates through a hybrid architecture:
 • LTD UK — scene of international fixation
 • Custodia — internal linkage of powers and participation
 • External representation — technical function without ownership rights
§2. All legal acts are forms of consensus, not domination.

Codex V — The Civil Codex of Imarchia

Formalizes citizenship as an active form of action and links the individual form with institutional memory.

Its purpose is to affirm citizenship as an active form of action, not a static status, and to ensure linkage between individual form and institutional memory.

📑 Contents of Book I

I. Preamble

Codex Civilis defines the forms of participation, linkage, and responsibility for every subject acting within the institutional field of Imarchia.

Its purpose is to affirm citizenship as an active form of action, not a static status, and to ensure linkage between individual form and institutional memory.

II. Definitions

  • Citizen — a subject who has undergone the Ritual of Recognition and holds a scenic status within Imarchia.
  • Scene — a formal institutional space in which the citizen acts, participates, or is acknowledged.
  • Ritual of Recognition — a formalized entry procedure involving signing, linkage, and archiving.
  • Form — a unique expression of civic identity, fixed in the passport and active within the scene.
  • Digital Trace — a set of technical markers confirming participation: hash, QR code, permanent link, signature.

III. Rights of Citizens

  • Participation in public scenes — the ability to actively engage in discussions, voting, and joint actions within the discipline.
  • Access to resources — archives, codices, educational modules, and partner programs for study and practical use.
  • Initiative — the right to propose new scenes, forms, projects, and codices, contributing to the development of the institutional environment.
  • Digital linkage — the right to a permanent digital trace, signature, and fixation of one’s actions, ensuring transparency and verifiability of participation.
  • Temporary exit and restoration — the ability to temporarily suspend participation, archive one’s forms, and later return, preserving previous rights and digital trace.

IV. Duties of Citizens

  • Observance of scenic rules — each citizen maintains order in public and closed scenes, respecting the boundaries of the Codex and the procedures of Custodia.
  • Active participation — citizens engage in discussions, voting, and joint projects, contributing to the development of the discipline.
  • Support of Custodia — preservation of the integrity and accessibility of archives, codices, and educational materials through personal actions and linkage.
  • Ritual recognition of new participants — the citizen takes part in onboarding and linkage of new members, sustaining cultural and formological continuity.
  • Ethical responsibility — the actions of citizens reflect the principles of the discipline, uphold public linkage, and respect the rights of other participants.

V. Mechanisms of Oversight and Verification of Civic Actions

  • Public linkage of actions — each act of the citizen is fixed through scenes, archives, and digital trace, enabling tracking of participation and confirmation of legitimacy.
  • Custodial supervision — custodians ensure the conformity of actions with the Codex, uphold integrity, and authorize transitions to new scenes.
  • Ritual revisions — periodic checks include confirmation of maturity, form compliance, and alignment with previous scenes.
  • Feedback — the citizen receives notifications about the results of verification, including recommendations for aligning actions with the principles of the discipline.
  • Archiving and restoration — each verification is fixed in the archive, enabling restoration of the participation path and legitimacy of the digital trace.

VI. Rights and Duties During the Verification Process

  • Right to participate in verification — each citizen is notified of inspections of their actions and may provide clarifications.
  • Duty of transparency — the citizen must fix their actions through scenes, digital trace, and archive to enable verification.
  • Right to correction — if inconsistency is identified, the citizen may ritually correct their actions and restore alignment with the Codex.
  • Duty of alignment — actions must conform to the established form, scenes, and instructions of the custodians.
  • Right to documentation — the citizen may create linkages and confirmations of their actions for public and archival use.

VII. Accountability and Consequences of Non-Compliance

  • Citizen’s accountability — each citizen is responsible for adhering to the form, linkage, and rules of the Codex Civilis.
  • Consequences of violation — breach of formological discipline may lead to temporary suspension of rights, ritual review, or scene correction.
  • Ritual correction — each act of violation may be remedied through public linkage, re-performance of the recognition ritual, or adjustment of the digital trace.
  • Transparency and oversight — all actions related to violations are fixed through Custodia and the archive, ensuring verifiability and legitimacy.
  • Restoration of powers — after correction and alignment, the citizen fully regains rights and status of participation in scenes.

Codex VI — The Codex of Integral Participation

Actus principalis de participatione, formis civitatis, ritibus transitionis et nexu archivistico.

📚 Index

Article I — Forms of Participation

§1. The Scene of Citizenship and Its Meaning

The citizen enters not as a user, but as an ethical actor. Participation is an act of recognition, not mere access.

§2. Conditions of Entry and Recognition

Entry occurs through ritual forms: petitions, confirmations, scenes of recognition. The citizen must publicly acknowledge and accept the codices.

§3. Ethical Principles of Participation

Observance of the scene, clarity of actions, preservation of ritual, refusal of profit. Participation cannot be anonymous if it affects other scenes.

§4. Statuses, Roles, and Transitions

A citizen may hold statuses: observer, citizen, custodian, curator. Transitions between statuses are formalized through public scenes.

Article II — Rites and Transitions

§1. Act of Recognition (Ritual Recognitionis)

A formal ritual through which the citizen receives status. It may be digital — with signature, hash, and public fixation.

§2. Scene of Status Transition

Transition of status (e.g., citizen → curator) requires a scene: proof of competence, consensus of custodians, and archival fixation.

§3. Ritual Forms of Exit

Exit is an act: voluntary, enforced, or transitional. It is always fixed and accompanied by archival signature.

§4. Transitional Statuses and Formation

Intermediate statuses: candidate, temporary custodian, guest. Formed with limitations and conditions defined in the appendices.

Article III — Custodia et Tractus

§1. Archival Protocols (Protocola Archivistica)

Every act of participation, transition, or exit is fixed in the archive. It may be public or private, but remains verifiable.

Documents, scenes, or actions receive permanent links and QR codes. Linkage and verification occur through them.

§3. Hash and Authenticity Confirmation (Digestum et Confirmatio Authenticitatis)

Documents are signed with a hash and published in an open registry. Substitution is excluded, integrity preserved.

§4. Archival Signature and Scene of Linkage (Subscriptio Archivistica et Scaena Tractus)

The act concludes with an archival signature: date, hash, link. This is the scene of linkage — a ritual executed and fixed.

Article IV — Rights of Citizens

§1. Participation

Participation in public scenes, discussions, and voting.

§2. Access

Access to archives, codices, educational modules, and partner programs.

§3. Initiative

Ability to initiate new scenes, forms, proposals, and codices.

§4. Digital Linkage

Right to permanent linkage, digital signature, and public trace.

§5. Temporary Exit

Right to temporarily exit, archive, and restore one’s form.

Article V — Appendices

  • Appendix A — Forms of entry, petitions, scenes of recognition
    Forms of entry, petitions, scenes of recognition

  • Appendix B — Examples of ritual acts and transitions
    Examples of ritual acts and transitions

  • Appendix C — Technical archival protocols, QR codes, and hashes
    Technical archival protocols, QR codes, and hashes

  • Appendix D — Scenes of exit and transitional statuses
    Scenes of exit and transitional statuses

📘 Final Affirmation

This Constitution of Imarchia is hereby affirmed as a valid form, linked to public memory, and open to expansion through ritual acts and scenes of recognition.
A ll provisions set forth in Books I and II take effect upon public fixation and archival signature.

▾

2025.10.02, CONSTITUTION

IMARCH Administration

const-en-01.pdf | A3E504F6F8057BB50DEBBB58C97F1DB08D059C7CB3BCFAE471EC5B26FB9958B7

📧 admin@imarch.sbs